A whiteboard agrees with everything you draw. This one counts what you gave away: pitch handed over, bodies left behind the ball, room opened up in behind.
Push the full-back up and the magnets agree. They do not mention the two defenders now facing three, or the channel you just emptied. That gap is where a week of preparation quietly goes wrong.
Which you already had in your head. It cannot count, it cannot object, and it forgets everything the moment you wipe it.
Four numbers, recomputed on every drag. Pin a shape and each one reports the difference your change made, in the direction it made it.
Geometry, not inference. They come out of the shape you built and they move the moment you drag someone, so nothing here has to be taken on trust.
Pitch your side reaches first, weighted by each player’s pace.
Between their last defender and their keeper. What a run has to attack.
Within reach of the ball. Where the next duel happens.
Left behind the ball against left up, if you lose it here.
The real board with the analysis switched off. Drag someone, change the shape, draw a run, write what you know about a player.
Click any shirt on the pitch and write what you know about him in plain words.
Signed in, these notes travel with the player onto the board and the analysis reads them. Ask how to handle their winger and the answer turns on what you wrote about him, not on a generic winger. It also measures control, rest defence and space in behind as you move, and says what each change costs.
Each step feeds the next. What you write about your players is what the analysis reads, and what it tells you is what the squad sees.
Name, position, pace. Two minutes for a full squad if you already keep one in a spreadsheet.
"Quick over ten metres, weak on his left, drops off after seventy." Once, against the player.
Drop the squad into a formation, mirror the opponent, drag anyone anywhere.
Four numbers recompute on every drag. Pin a shape first and they report the difference.
The read, the change, what it costs, who it needs. Four lines, movements drawn on the pitch.
The board, the plan and the reasoning, laid out to be read from the back.
You can always see why it flagged what it flagged, and what the recommendation gives up. That is the difference between a tool a coach trusts and one he stops opening.
Control, rest defence, compactness and space in behind come out of the geometry. Pin a shape and every number afterwards is a difference.
Point at the winger who worries you. Who shows him which way, who covers, what it costs. For this picture, not in general.
What you write about a player stays with him and changes every answer about him from then on.
Positional, direct, relational, counter, pressing, or none. The analysis solves through yours instead of substituting its own.
Every recommendation names what it gives up and the one condition that keeps it safe. A plan without a trade-off is not analysis.
Which moment, the real shape, the problem, their response, rest defence counted, width counted, and whether it survives.
What you pay for is the analysis, the squads behind it, and getting a plan out of here and into the team meeting.
The board and the numbers
One coach, everything on
Academies and youth clubs
Professional clubs
Paid plans are not open yet. Everything on the Free plan works today, and the prices above are what they will cost when they open.
No. The board on this page is the real one with the analysis switched off. Dragging players, drawing runs and writing notes all work signed out. An account is what makes it measure and answer.